Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?
Date
Msg-id 5032D7C9.3050201@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 08/20/2012 05:12 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 08/20/2012 07:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>> Moreover, as Josh just mentioned, anybody who
>> thinks it might be insufficiently secure for their purposes has got
>> plenty of alternatives available today (SSL certificates, PAM backed
>> by whatever-you-want, etc).
>>
>
> Yeah, I think we need to emphasize this lots more. Anyone who wants
> really secure authentication needs to be getting away from password
> based auth altogether. Another hash function will make very little
> difference.

Actually, I concede here. If we were pushing our other abilities more 
visibly, I don't know that this argument would ever come up.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
>
>
>


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
@cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: temporal support patch
Next
From: Qi Huang
Date:
Subject: [PATCH]Tablesample Submission