On 08/16/2012 11:19 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 16.08.2012 17:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:42:45PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> On 16.08.2012 17:36, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>> In docs, change a few cases of "not important" to "unimportant".
>>>
>>> FWIW, I don't think these changes were an improvement. I find "not
>>> important" more readable in those sentences.
>>
>> Really? All of them?
>
> Yes.. Perhaps "not important" just feels better to me in general than
> "unimportant".
>
I agree that none of these looks like an improvement. A couple look like
50-50 choices, but it doesn't look to me like "not important" is clearly
worse in any of them.
cheers
andrew