Re: PostgreSQL oom_adj postmaster process to -17 - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: PostgreSQL oom_adj postmaster process to -17
Date
Msg-id 50237E3B02000025000494DB@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL oom_adj postmaster process to -17  (Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au>)
List pgsql-admin
Craig Ringer <ringerc@ringerc.id.au> wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 04:24 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Number_Of_Database_Connections
>>
> Can we please please PLEASE link to that as a comment above
> max_connections?
>
> Last time this came up nobody was happy with wording of a comment
> so nothing got done. It's a real usability wart - causing
> real-world performance and reliability problems - that people
> unwittingly raise max_connections to absurd levels because they
> get no warnings, hints or guidance of any sort.

I see that we currently have five links to wiki.postgresql.org in
release notes and four more in the rest of the docs.  Are people OK
with adding this link to the docs on max_connections?  (Feel free to
improve it before answering if you have qualms about the specifics
on that page.)

We do seem to get an awful lot of posts (between here and
StackOverflow) from people who assume they need one database
connection per active user, and then are surprised that performance
is horrible.

If we get consensus on linking to this I'll put together a patch to
make a brief comment in the docs with a link to the Wiki.

-Kevin

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Smith, Hazel"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 authentication against LDAP/AD
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Wiki link for max_connections? (Fwd: Re: PostgreSQL oom_adj postmaster process to -17)