Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123
Date
Msg-id 502230D102000025000494AC@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123
Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Did we ever decide on this?
We discussed it to the point of consensus, and Tom wrote a patch to
implement that.  Testing in my shop hit problems for which the cause
was not obvious.  I don't know whether there is a flaw in the
designed approach that we all missed, a simple programming bug of
some sort in the patch, or pilot error on this end.  It's on my list
of things to do, but it's hovering around 4th place on that list,
and new things seem to be appearing at the top of that list at about
the rate that I can clear them.  :-(
> Is it a TODO?
We don't want to lose track of it, but with a pending patch to
debug, I'm not sure the TODO list is the right place to put it.
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?