Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix mapping of PostgreSQL encodings to Python encodings. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix mapping of PostgreSQL encodings to Python encodings.
Date
Msg-id 501FB1AF.8030103@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix mapping of PostgreSQL encodings to Python encodings.  (Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>)
Responses Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix mapping of PostgreSQL encodings to Python encodings.
List pgsql-hackers
On 20.07.2012 10:13, Jan Urbański wrote:
> On 20/07/12 08:59, Jan Urbański wrote:
>> On 18/07/12 17:17, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> On 14.07.2012 17:50, Jan Urbański wrote:
>>>
>>> If pg_do_encoding_conversion() throws an error, you don't get a chance
>>> to call Py_DECREF() to release the string. Is that a problem?
>>>
>>> If an error occurs in PLy_traceback(), after incrementing
>>> recursion_depth, you don't get a chance to decrement it again. I'm not
>>> sure if the Py* function calls can fail, but at least seemingly trivial
>>> things like initStringInfo() can throw an out-of-memory error.
>>
>> Of course you're right (on both accounts).
>>
>> Here's a version with a bunch of PG_TRies thrown in.
>
> Silly me, playing tricks with postincrements before fully waking up.
>
> Here's v3, with a correct inequality test for exceeding the traceback
> recursion test.

Committed the convert-via-UTF-8 part of this. I'll take a closer look at 
the recursion check next.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: several problems in pg_receivexlog
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP patch for LATERAL subqueries