Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity
Date
Msg-id 5015.1083942576@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity  ("Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>)
Responses Re: Interpreting vacuum verbosity
List pgsql-general
"Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net> writes:
> I guess the activity just totally outran the ability of autovac to keep up.

Could you have been bit by autovac's bug with misreading '3e6' as '3'?
If you don't have a recent version it's likely to fail to vacuum large
tables often enough.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Eric Ridge
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing the size of a varchar field
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: My database hurts "ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint"