Re: canceling autovacuum task woes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: canceling autovacuum task woes
Date
Msg-id 500EE84D.8090301@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to canceling autovacuum task woes  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 07/24/2012 01:48 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I am running into a lot of customer situations where the customer
> reports that "canceling autovacuum task" shows up in the logs, and
> it's unclear whether this is happening often enough to matter, and
> even more unclear what's causing it.
>
> Me: So, do you know what table it's getting cancelled on?
> Customer: Nope.
> Me: Are you running any DDL commands anywhere in the cluster?
> Customer: Nope, absolutely none.
> Me: Well you've got to be running something somewhere or it wouldn't
> be having a lock conflict.
> Customer: OK, well I don't know of any.  What should I do?
>
> It would be awfully nice if the process that does the cancelling would
> provide the same kind of reporting that we do for a deadlock: the
> relevant lock tag, the PID of the process sending the cancel, and the
> query string.
>

+1 for more information on this.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: canceling autovacuum task woes
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API