On 07/19/2012 01:48 PM, Christopher Browne wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 07/19/2012 01:04 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>
>>> I did a backport of temp_file_limit feature to 9.1, but when we tested
>>> this patch, we found very restristrictive limit to 2GB.
>>>
>>> 2GB is nonsense, because this is session limit of temp files, and
>>> these files should be longer than 2GB.
>>
>>
>> I haven't read the patch but... don't all 32bit platforms have a 2GB limit
>> (by default)?
>
> I don't think so.
>
> LFS got done in the mid-90s, which is long enough ago for people to
> start forgetting about it. Are there any supported platforms that
> didn't adopt LFS?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_file_support
Note: "by default" :). I know they could support LFS but as I recall you
had to compile specifically for it (at least on linux and old versions
of pg).
So I was curious if it was that specific limitation or a limitation
within the Pg code itself.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
@cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579
