It's rumoured that Andreas Pflug once said:
> Exactly. I've seen quite a lot of querying tools, and most of them were
> quite ugly and at the edge of usability. For my experience, I think
> two tool windows are the easiest way to handle it, not only in
> concerning coding, but also regarding user handling. The best tool
> I've been working with was MSSQL2000's ISQLW, which does use separate
> windows for editing and arbitrary query output. And pgadmin3 is going
> to be better, because its schema representation is better.
Yup, certainly is. BTW, did you know that thanks to Frank Lupo, pga2 fully
supports Casts and Conversions in the schema now?
> For a programmer, acceptance stands and falls by the tools. We are on
> the way to supply a tool that leaves virtually no wishes. Let's show
> those big companies that open software is better! Who needs O.., who
> needs M..., we got PostgreSQL!
Damn straight!! :-)
Regards, Dave.
