Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result
Date
Msg-id 5001BBB7.5070600@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 26.06.2012 18:06, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Fujii Masao<masao.fujii@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre@commandprompt.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Excerpts from Fujii Masao's message of mar mar 27 06:40:34 -0300 2012:
>>>
>>>> Anyway, should I add this patch into the next CF? Or is anyone planning
>>>> to commit the patch for 9.2?
>>>
>>> I think the correct thing to do here is add to next CF, and if some
>>> committer has enough interest in getting it quickly it can be grabbed
>>> from there and committed into 9.2.
>>
>> Yep! I've added it to next CF.
>
> Attached is the revised version of the patch.

Looks good to me, committed.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: sign mismatch in walreceiver.c
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Getting rid of pre-assignment of index names in CREATE TABLE LIKE