On 13/07/12 13:38, Jan Urbański wrote:
> On 12/07/12 11:08, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 07.07.2012 00:12, Jan Urbański wrote:
>>> So you're in favour of doing unicode -> bytes by encoding with UTF-8 and
>>> then using the server's encoding functions?
>>
>> Sounds reasonable to me. The extra conversion between UTF-8 and UCS-2
>> should be quite fast, and it would be good to be consistent in the way
>> we do conversions in both directions.
>>
>
> I'll implement that than (sorry for not following up on that eariler).
Here's a patch that always encodes Python unicode objects using UTF-8
and then uses Postgres's internal functions to produce bytes in the
server encoding.
Cheers,
Jan
