Performance impact of record sizes - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From John Moore
Subject Performance impact of record sizes
Date
Msg-id 5.1.1.6.2.20020704115439.02202480@pop3.norton.antivirus
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Performance impact of record sizes  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
We have a need to store text data which typically is just a hundred or so
bytes, but in some cases may extend to a few thousand. Our current field
has a varchar of 1024, which is not large enough. Key data is fixed sized
and much smaller in this same record.

Our application is primarily transaction oriented, which means that records
will normally be fetched via random access, not sequential scans.

The question  is: what size thresholds exist? I assume that there is a
"page" size over which the record will be split into more than one. What is
that size, and does the spill cost any more or less than I had split the
record into two or more individual records in order to handle the same data?

Obviously, the easiest thing for me to do is just set the varchar to
something big (say - 10K) but I don't want to do this without understanding
the OLTP performance impact.

Thanks in advance



John Moore

http://www.tinyvital.com/personal.html

UNITED WE STAND






pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Union strange explain
Next
From: John Moore
Date:
Subject: views: performance implication