Re: Client/Server compression? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lincoln Yeoh
Subject Re: Client/Server compression?
Date
Msg-id 5.1.0.14.1.20020317194454.02d3ed90@192.228.128.13
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Client/Server compression?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
You can also use stunnel for SSL. Preferable to having SSL in postgresql 
I'd think.

Cheerio,
Link.

At 03:38 PM 3/16/02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

>FWIW, I was not in favor of the SSL addition either, since (just as you
>say) it does nothing that couldn't be done with an SSH tunnel.  If I had




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] problem with array of boxes
Next
From: Gavin Sherry
Date:
Subject: Another misinformed article