Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date
Msg-id 5.1.0.14.0.20021024113443.028ed528@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 10:42 AM 23/10/2002 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>What I am concerned about are cases that fail at runtime, specifically
>during a restore of a >2gig file.

Please give an example that would still apply assuming we get a working 
seek/tell pair that works with whatever we use as an offset?

If you are concerned about reading a dump file with 8 byte offsets on a 
machine with 4 byte off_t, that case and it's permutations are already covered.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?