Re: Re: Call for platforms - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Knox
Subject Re: Re: Call for platforms
Date
Msg-id 5.0.2.1.0.20010328205126.009ea190@core.hardline.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Call for platforms  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: Call for platforms  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 12:27 AM 3/28/01 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

>That would fix it for ARM but not for anyplace else with similar
>alignment behavior.  Would you try this patch instead to see what
>happens?

I don't think this solution would be valid on many other platforms. It forces the structure to not be padded, and
assumesthat the cpu will be able to fetch from unaligned boundaries. The only reason this works is that the arm linux
kernelcontains an alignment trap handler that catches the fault and does a fixup on the access. Otherwise it would
crashwith SIGBUS.
 

>  static FormData_pg_attribute a1 = {
>!       0xffffffff, {"ctid"}, TIDOID, 0, SizeOfIptrData,
>        SelfItemPointerAttributeNumber, 0, -1, -1, '\0', 'p', '\0', 'i', '\0', '\0'
>  }; 

Well, this patch seems to produce attlens of 6 as desired, but it causes many (13) of the regression tests to fail. Do
youwant to see the regression.diffs? 
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mathijs Brands
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Call for platforms