On 28/09/2018 09:35, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> That's certainly a good argument. Note that if we implemented that the
>> transaction timestamp is advanced inside procedures, that would also
>> mean that the transaction timestamp as observed in pg_stat_activity
>> would move during VACUUM, for example. That might or might not be
>> desirable.
>
> Attached is a rough implementation.
>
> I'd be mildly in favor of doing this, but we have mentioned tradeoffs in
> this thread.
So do we want to do this or not?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
