Re: Separate memory contexts for relcache and catcache - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Separate memory contexts for relcache and catcache
Date
Msg-id 4edadffe14ead8860f4d02141aaf154871fef0cb.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Separate memory contexts for relcache and catcache  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Separate memory contexts for relcache and catcache
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2024-11-11 at 17:05 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> It will be good
> to move ahead with the ones we all agree for now. Looking at all the
> emails, those will be CatCacheContext,
> RelCacheContext, PlanCacheContext, TypCacheContext.

I'm not sure we have consensus on all of those yet. Andres's concern,
IIUC, is that the additional memory contexts will cause additional
fragmentation.

I believe we have a rough consensus that CatCacheContext and
RelCacheContext are wanted, but we're trying to find ways to mitigate
the fragmentation.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michel Pelletier
Date:
Subject: Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql
Next
From: Michel Pelletier
Date:
Subject: Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql