Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE
Date
Msg-id 4e832b41-a53c-907c-4ece-a4796590d1f5@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/7/17 12:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is there a good reason why RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE is 'P' not 'p'?

I was confused about this too.  If there is no argument against it, I
would favor changing it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cast result of copyNode()
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API