Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Raymond Toy: Case sensitivity bug with large objects! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vadim B. Mikheev
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Raymond Toy: Case sensitivity bug with large objects!
Date
Msg-id 4e7e491a134e2a8ff92af72a39001aef
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Raymond Toy: Case sensitivity bug with large objects!  ("Vadim B. Mikheev" <vadim@sable.krasnoyarsk.su>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >
> > The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > > > The lack of case-sensitivity could cause tables that start with xinv* to
> > > > be confused as large objects.
> > > >
> > > > What do we do?
> >
> > Could the xinv* names generated by postgres to support large objects
> > have a slightly different name, for example starting with an underscore
> > or a dot?
>
> We could change large object names from xinv to _inv?  That makes sense.
> pg_dump does not process large objects.

Why don't use relkind ?

>
> What do we do with 6.1?  How many people have tables that begin with
> xinv?
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian
> maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

------------------------------

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Igor
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Embedding scripting
Next
From: David Friend
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Forms package and other companion software.