Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?
Date
Msg-id 4e53258d-d394-b23b-cb24-89812ca3675c@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?
List pgsql-hackers

On 2020/05/07 13:49, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:48:35AM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
>> I could not find any code reference to smgrdounlink, I feel it can be
>> removed.
> 
> The last use of smgrdounlink() was b416691.  I have just looked at
> Debian Code Search and github, and could not find a hit with the
> function being used in some custom extension code, so it feels like a
> safe bet to remove it.

+1

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Why are wait events not reported even though it reads/writes atimeline history file?
Next
From: Erik Nordström
Date:
Subject: Feedback on table expansion hook (including patch)