On 2018/05/09 22:43, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2018/05/09 11:31, David Rowley wrote:
>>> On 9 May 2018 at 14:29, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>>> On 2018/05/09 11:20, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>>> While looking at this code, is there any reason to not make
>>>>> gen_partprune_steps static? This is only used in partprune.c for now,
>>>>> so the intention is to make it available for future patches?
>
>> Here is a patch that does that.
>
> Pushed, thanks.
Thank you.
Regards,
Amit
