On 11/11/2016 12:11 AM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing this patch. I would like to update you that this
> patch has got dependency on a patch for concurrent hash index and WAL
> log in hash index. So, till these two patches for hash index are not
> stable I won't be able to share you a next version of patch for
> supporting microvacuum in hash index.
>
As the concurrent hash index patch was committed in 6d46f4 this patch
needs a rebase.
I have moved this submission to the next CF.
Thanks for working on this !
Best regards, Jesper
