RE: BUG #18942 and BUG #18938 solution available in Pg16 latest release 16.10 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Ishan Arunkumar Joshi
Subject RE: BUG #18942 and BUG #18938 solution available in Pg16 latest release 16.10
Date
Msg-id 4cd89092e95d48d297039824b0c804c6@netcracker.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #18942 and BUG #18938 solution available in Pg16 latest release 16.10  (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
Hello David,

Thanks for your reply but I think that is separate issue that is mentioned in the release note. As the bug are related
tomemory allocation while logical replication slots is been configured ("invalid memory alloc request size 1803546384")
where the release note is related to partialy written WAL which is not the use case.
 

Thanks & Regards,
-------------------------
Ishan Joshi

-----Original Message-----
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2025 3:07 AM
To: Ishan Arunkumar Joshi <ishan.joshi@netcracker.com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: BUG #18942 and BUG #18938 solution available in Pg16 latest release 16.10

[External Email]
________________________________



On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 10:14, Ishan Arunkumar Joshi <ishan.joshi@netcracker.com> wrote:
> we were facing issue while performing logical replication error as follows which are similar to BUG 18942 and 18938
inPG v16.9. We gone through the Release note for PG v16.10 but not able to find the solution for above mentioned bug
releasedor not.
 
>
> can you please help to understand if the solution is available for BUG 18942 and 18938  in latest PG16 release
16.10.

Yes. Mentioned in: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/16/release-16-10.html

"Avoid infinite wait in logical decoding when reading a partially-written WAL record (Vignesh C) §

If the server crashes after writing the first part of a WAL record that would span multiple pages, subsequent logical
decodingof the WAL stream would wait for data to arrive on the next WAL page. That might never happen if the server is
nowidle."
 

David


________________________________
The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential,proprietary and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
takingof any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited.If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
 

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #19092: scram_free() will free on address which was not malloc()-ed in pg_scram_mech
Next
From: Emmanuel Touzery
Date:
Subject: Re: ERROR: XX000: could not find memoization table entry (reproducible)