Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 4cbe3187-921b-d3a3-467c-d09bdd10b8c1@berkus.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL  ("Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] SQL/JSON in PostgreSQL  ("Sven R. Kunze" <srkunze@mail.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 03/09/2017 10:12 AM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> On 08.03.2017 20:52, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca
>> <mailto:pvh@pvh.ca>> wrote:
>>
>>     Small point of order: YAML is not strictly a super-set of JSON.
>>
>>     Editorializing slightly, I have not seen much interest in the
>>     world for YAML support though I'd be interested in evidence to the
>>     contrary.
>>
>>
>> The world of configuration management seems to for some reason run off
>> YAML, but that's the only places I've seen it recently (ansible,
>> puppet etc).
> 
> SaltStack uses YAML for their tools, too. I personally can empathize
> with them (as a user of configuration management) about this as writing
> JSON would be nightmare with all the quoting, commas, curly braces etc.
> But that's my own preference maybe.
> 
> (Btw. does "run off" mean like or avoid? At least my dictionaries tend
> to the latter.)

Yes, but automated tools can easily convert between JSON and
newline-delimited YAML and back.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Containers & Databases Oh My!



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading postmaster's log messages about bind/listenerrors
Next
From: Victor Wagner
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Explicit subtransactions for PL/Tcl