Re: pgpool - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua Tolley
Subject Re: pgpool
Date
Msg-id 4c29f4cb.c84de70a.5898.7f19@mx.google.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgpool  (Geoffrey <lists@serioustechnology.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 07:07:33AM -0400, Geoffrey wrote:
> A couple of questions regarding pgpool:
>
> Is there a problem with using multiple connection pools for the same
> database?  Point being, we might want to give a higher number of
> connections to one group of users then another.  I can see doing this by
> having separate connection pools.  The higher priority users have a
> larger connection pool.

That's entirely reasonable.

> Is there a problem with using connection pooling and traditional
> connections to connect to the same database?

Nope.

--
Joshua Tolley / eggyknap
End Point Corporation
http://www.endpoint.com

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "A. Kretschmer"
Date:
Subject: Re: alter table schema, default sequences stay the same
Next
From: Joshua Tolley
Date:
Subject: Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?