Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of "unknown error" in dblink andpostgres_fdw - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of "unknown error" in dblink andpostgres_fdw
Date
Msg-id 4bdf36c8-f325-3059-7421-b92cad2aa894@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Getting rid of "unknown error" in dblink and postgres_fdw  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/22/2016 06:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>> On 12/21/2016 09:20 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I see that you need to pass the PGconn into dblink_res_error() now, but
>>> what's the point of the new "bool fail" parameter?
>
>> That part isn't new -- we added it sometime prior to 9.2:
>
> Oh!  I misread the patch --- something about an unluckily-placed line
> wrap and not looking very closely :-(.  Yeah, it's fine as is.
> Sorry for the noise.

Thanks -- committed/backpatched to 9.2

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning.
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] An attempt to reduce WALWriteLock contention