Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vik Fearing
Subject Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
Date
Msg-id 4b5a5c5e-2f88-1987-1c09-e991ff6d3588@postgresfriends.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to factorial function/phase out postfix operators?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/18/20 4:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> There have been occasional discussions about deprecating or phasing out
> postfix operators, to make various things easier in the parser.
> 
> The first step would in any case be to provide alternatives for the
> existing postfix operators.  There is currently one, namely the numeric
> factorial operator "!".  A sensible alternative for that would be
> providing a function factorial(numeric) -- and that already exists but
> is not documented.  (Note that the operator is mapped to proname
> "numeric_fac".  The function "factorial" maps to the same prosrc but is
> otherwise independent of the operator.)
> 
> So I suggest that we add that function to the documentation.

I think this should be done regardless.

> (Some adjacent cleanup work might also be in order.  The test cases for
> factorial are currently in int4.sql, but all the factorial functionality
> was moved to numeric a long time ago.)
> 
> What are the thoughts about then marking the postfix operator deprecated
> and eventually removing it?

I am greatly in favor of removing postfix operators as soon as possible.
-- 
Vik Fearing



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: fill_extraUpdatedCols is done in completely the wrong place
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Vintage unused variables in pg_dump.c