On 3/31/26 9:16 AM, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 at 08:30, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote:
>> Rebased it again.
>
> I agree this looks better. So seems like a reasonable improvement.
Thanks for taking a look!
But noticed now that the tests were broken so here is a new version
where they pass and where I also added a new test case for struct
literals with named fields.
Andreas