Re: PostgreSQL index issue - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: PostgreSQL index issue
Date
Msg-id 4FFF6483.9080300@ringerc.id.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL index issue  (codevally <codevally.mail.list@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 07/13/2012 06:06 AM, codevally wrote:
> Hi Laurenz
>
> Many thanks for your reply.
>
> Could you please bit more explain about the following sentence you wrote:
>
> There are no performance problems except the ones that always come with an
> index: INSERTs, UPDATEs and DELETEs will be slower and do more disk I/O and
> locking.

Every index you add slows down modifications to the table a little bit,
because it has to be kept up to date. It also uses more disk space and
takes time for VACCUM.

--
Craig Ringer

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: codevally
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL index issue
Next
From: Toby Corkindale
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug? Prepared queries continue to use search_path from their preparation time