On 06/28/2012 11:37 AM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:16 AM, David E. Wheeler<david@justatheory.com> wrote:
>> Hackers,
>>
>> Very interesting design document for SQLite 4:
>>
>> http://www.sqlite.org/src4/doc/trunk/www/design.wiki
>>
>> I'm particularly intrigued by "covering indexes". For example:
>>
>> CREATE INDEX cover1 ON table1(a,b) COVERING(c,d);
> I don't see the virtue of this in this case. Since the index is not
> unique, why not just put the index on (a,b,c,d) and be done with it?
> Is there some advantage to be had in inventing a way to store c and d
> in the index without having them usable for indexing?
>
Presumably the comparison function will be faster the fewer attributes
it needs to compare.
cheers
andrew
