Re: Posix Shared Mem patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Date
Msg-id 4FEA3596.3060501@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Posix Shared Mem patch  ("A.M." <agentm@themactionfaction.com>)
Responses Re: Posix Shared Mem patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> This can be trivially reproduced if one runs an old (SysV shared memory-based) postgresql alongside a potentially
newerpostgresql with a smaller SysV segment. This can occur with applications that bundle postgresql as part of the
app.

I'm not saying it doesn't happen at all.  I'm saying it's not the 80%
case.

So let's fix the 80% case with something we feel confident in, and then
revisit the no-sysv interlock as a separate patch.  That way if we can't
fix the interlock issues, we still have a reduced-shmem version of Postgres.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "A.M."
Date:
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch