On 20.06.2012 11:34, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 20 June 2012 16:23, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> It's only needed for multi-master replication, where the same table can be
>> updated from multiple nodes. Just leave that out for now. There's plenty of
>> functionality and issues left even without that.
>
> Huh? Multi-master replication is what is being built here and many
> people want that.
Sure, but presumably you're going to implement master-slave first, and
build multi-master on top of that. What I'm saying is that we can leave
out the origin-id for now, since we don't have agreement on it, and
revisit it after master-slave replication is working.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
