Re: use of int4/int32 in C code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: use of int4/int32 in C code
Date
Msg-id 4FE0AEA40200002500048716@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: use of int4/int32 in C code  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: use of int4/int32 in C code  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I have not looked to see how many places do that.  If it's a
reasonably
> small number of places, I'm OK with getting rid of int4 at the C
level.
> (int2/int8 the same of course.)
$ find -name '*.h' -or -name '*.c' | egrep -v '/tmp_check/' | xargs cat
\
 | egrep -c '\bint2\b'
178
 | egrep -c '\bint4\b'
570
 | egrep -c '\bint8\b'
212
-Kevin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] Introduce the concept that wal has a 'origin' node
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore logging inconsistency