On 06/13/2012 03:25 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> Going through the thread, I'd like to sum it up choosing approach with
> less potential issues and would like to find a consensus if possible.
>
> It seems unix_socket_directory could be turned into list and probably
> renamed to unix_socket_directories, since it would be confusing if a
> list value is in singular. On the other hand, we probably don't want to
> specify listening ports together with additional unix sockets in one
> configuration option, so it seems better to add a new configuration
> option to distinguish the primary listening port from additional ports.
>
> Regards,
> Honza
A draft patch is attached. It renames unix_socket_directory to
unix_socket_directories and allows to use directory:port to be able to
create more sockets in one directory with different port number in the
socket name.
Regards,
Honza
