Re: inserting a column into a view - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Richard Terry
Subject Re: inserting a column into a view
Date
Msg-id 4FD7DFD1.9090401@pacific.net.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: inserting a column into a view  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-novice
Tom Lane wrote:
Richard Terry <rterry@internode.on.net> writes: 
When you modify a table some time down the track and insert a new 
column, then need to update a view,  postgres always seems to insist 
that you cascade drop all dependant views and rebuild them. I've got a 
huge database and find I'm in this situation some years down the track 
from its inceptions.   
Well, any release since 8.4 should let you dodge the "cascade drop"
bit, because you can add new columns at the end of a view:

regression=# create table t(f1 int);
CREATE TABLE
regression=# create view v as select * from t;
CREATE VIEW
regression=# alter table t add column f2 text;
ALTER TABLE
regression=# create or replace view v as select * from t;
CREATE VIEW
regression=# \d v      View "public.v"Column |  Type   | Modifiers 
--------+---------+-----------f1     | integer | f2     | text    | 
View definition:SELECT t.f1, t.f2  FROM t;

People occasionally complain that they shouldn't have to do the CREATE
OR REPLACE step because "select * should mean returning the current set
of columns from the underlying table".  However, the SQL standard says
otherwise: * is to be expanded at view definition time.
		regards, tom lane
 
Can't thank you enough, this has been the bane of my life over time .. guess that's why I'm on the novice list (no formal programming training!).

REgards

richard


pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Ross Boylan
Date:
Subject: Re: coalesce in plpgsql, and other style questions
Next
From: Daniel Staal
Date:
Subject: Re: coalesce in plpgsql, and other style questions