Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs writes:
>> On 31 May 2012 15:00, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> If we want to finish the beta cycle in a reasonable time period
>>> and get back to actual development, we have to refrain from
>>> adding more possibly-destabilizing development work to 9.2. And
>>> that is what this is.
>
>> In what way is it possibly destabilising?
>
> I'm prepared to believe that it only affects performance, but it
> could be destabilizing to that. It needs proper review and testing,
> and the next CF is the right environment for that to happen.
+1
This is not a bug fix or even a fix for a performance regression.
The train has left the station; the next one will be along shortly.
-Kevin
