Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Euler Taveira
Subject Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea
Date
Msg-id 4FC28670.5050805@timbira.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea
List pgsql-hackers
On 27-05-2012 10:45, Fujii Masao wrote:
> OK, let me propose another approach: add pg_size_pretty(int).
> If we do this, all usability and performance problems will be solved.
>
I wouldn't like to add another function but if it solves both problems... +1.


--   Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira       http://www.timbira.com.br/  PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento,
Suporte24x7 e Treinamento
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Backends stalled in 'startup' state: index corruption
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug in new buffering GiST build code