Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication
Date
Msg-id 4FB3EBB4.3090603@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication  (Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Well, that is a form of testing. :)

My point was that we need some kind of regression tests around all the new replication stuff, and if you had some
scriptsthat would be a useful starting point. But it sounds like you haven't gotten that far with it, so...
 

On 5/15/12 10:12 AM, Joshua Berkus wrote:
> Jim,
>
> I didn't get as far as running any tests, actually.  All I did was try to set up 3 servers in cascading replication.
ThenI tried shutting down master-master and promoting master-replica.  That's it.
 
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On May 13, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> More issues: promoting intermediate standby breaks replication.
>>>
>>> To be a bit blunt here, has anyone tested cascading replication *at
>>> all*
>>> before this?
>>
>> Josh, do you have scripts that you're using to do this testing? If so
>> can you post them somewhere?
>>
>> AFAIK we don't have any regression tests for all this replication
>> stuff, but ISTM that we need some...
>> --
>> Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect                   jim@nasby.net
>> 512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net
>>
>>
>


-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect                   jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] Checkpointer on hot standby runs without looking checkpoint_segments
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication