On 05/11/2012 08:56 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:46:56PM -0700, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On May 10, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>>> On 05/10/2012 06:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> How about a hybrid: we continue to identify patch authors as now, that is with names attached to the
feature/bugfixdescriptions, and then have a separate section "Other Contributors" to recognize patch reviewers and
otherhelpers?
>>> works for me.
>> Me, too.
> That does not work for me. There is no practical reason for a list of
> names to appear in the release notes. I suggest if we want to do that
> that we remove all names from the release notes (as Tom suggested), and
> create a wiki for credit, and link to that from the release
> announcement. That would allow us to put company names in there too.
>
I gave you a reason. You might not agree with it but saying that it's no
reason doesn't make it so. A wiki page will just be duplication, IMNSHO.
cheers
andrew
