Re: Draft release notes complete - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Draft release notes complete
Date
Msg-id 4FABE2CC.401@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Draft release notes complete  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Draft release notes complete
List pgsql-hackers

On 05/10/2012 11:24 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:49:51PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/10/2012 01:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Bruce Momjian<bruce@momjian.us>    writes:
>>>>> The docs finally built 90 minutes after my commit, and the URL above is
>>>>> now working.  (Does it always take this long to update?)
>>>> I believe the new implementation of that stuff is that the devel docs
>>>> are built whenever the buildfarm member guaibasaurus runs for HEAD,
>>>> which it seems to do on an hourly schedule.  This is definitely not as
>>>> fast-responding as Peter's former custom script, but I'm not sure if
>>>> it's worth thinking of another way.
>>>>
>>> I don't see any reason it can't run more frequently, though. Currently a run
>>> takes 15 minutes or so. We could reduce that by making it skip some steps,
>>> and get it down to about 10 minutes. It would be perfectly reasonable to run
>>> every 5 minutes (it won't schedule concurrent runs - if the lock file is
>>> held by another run it exits gracefully). Of course, that's up to Magnus and
>>> Stefan.
>> If we can make it do *just* the docs, we can certainly run it a bit
>> more often. But we don't want to make it run the full set of checks
>> more or less continously, since the machine is shared with a number of
>> other tasks...
>>
>> I don't think 5 minutes is anywhere near necessary even for the docs,
>> but there is a lot of room between 5 minutes and 4 hours, so we can
>> definitely shorten it.
> Do you want me to just setup a build on my machine like we did before;
> 5 minutes is no problem for me.
>
> I use the doc build to show patch submitters what their final work looks
> like, and anything more than a few minutes delay makes that useless.
>

It's been done the current way for quite a few months now. If you're 
only noticing it now is it really such an inconvenience? Having said 
that, I'm not at all opposed to reducing the lag time.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete