Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 4FAB4491.6040504@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
List pgsql-hackers
On 05/09/2012 11:15 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:07:52PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I'll point out that this patch got sandbagged to death, and never made
>> it into 9.2.  So, for 9.2 replication is just as hard to configure and
>> manage as it was in 9.1.  Are we going to fix it in 9.3, or not?
>
> Greg Smith was going to allow for files in configuration directories,
> and that was somehow going to make it easier to manage the configuration
> files and remove recovery.conf.  I don't think Greg did it;  I didn't
> see it in the release notes I just wrote.

That was actually submitted back in November, and rightly kicked back as 
needing more work.  I would have updated it and resubmitted if that was 
the only blocker.  But by the time January rolled around, it was already 
obvious that the last CommitFest was going into overtime.  Didn't seem 
like a great time to add a disruptive change like this one into the mix.

I expect to revisit config directories before the first 9.3 CF, it will 
help multiple things I'd like to see happen.  Then we can circle back to 
the main unification job with a fairly clear path forward from there.

-- 
Greg Smith   2ndQuadrant US    greg@2ndQuadrant.com   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete