Chrishelring wrote:
> Hmm.. Haden´t thought about making a view. It should work because the
> application that uses the data is read-only (yet!).
>
> I´ll give that a try. Thanks!
Well a view is a much more natural solution than the other proposal, about
constantly doing data definition / changing the schemas for each access like
this proposal. In fact, what you talk about sounds like an ideal case for
views; you could have 2 complete schemas, one per application, where each
corresponds to the other but one is lowercase and one is uppercase, and one is a
view. -- Darren Duncan
