Re: Future In-Core Replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Future In-Core Replication
Date
Msg-id 4F9B1BD4.8040505@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Future In-Core Replication  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/27/2012 11:33 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Well, they all sound similar. My info was that Mammoth was not WAL-based. 
Mammoth was transaction log based but not WAL based.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: xReader, double-effort
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)