Re: auto-vacuum vs. full table update - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: auto-vacuum vs. full table update
Date
Msg-id 4F99A7BC.3030709@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to auto-vacuum vs. full table update  (Craig James <cjames@emolecules.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 04/26/2012 12:49 PM, Craig James wrote:
>
> An update to our system means I'm going to be rewriting every row of
> some large tables (20 million rows by 15 columns).  In a situation
> like this, can auto-vacuum take care of it, or should I plan on
> vacuum-full/reindex to clean up?
>

If you rewrite the whole table, you will end up with a table twice the
size, it will not be compacted but as the table grows, the old space
will be reused.

jD

> This is 8.4.4.
>
> Thanks,
> Craig
>


--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Craig James
Date:
Subject: auto-vacuum vs. full table update
Next
From: Steve Crawford
Date:
Subject: Re: auto-vacuum vs. full table update