Re: Bug? Query plans / EXPLAIN using gigabytes of memory - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Toby Corkindale
Subject Re: Bug? Query plans / EXPLAIN using gigabytes of memory
Date
Msg-id 4F98F65D.1020101@strategicdata.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug? Query plans / EXPLAIN using gigabytes of memory  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Bug? Query plans / EXPLAIN using gigabytes of memory  (Toby Corkindale <toby.corkindale@strategicdata.com.au>)
List pgsql-general
On 26/04/12 16:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Toby Corkindale<toby.corkindale@strategicdata.com.au>  writes:
>> On 26/04/12 15:30, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hm, is the update target an inheritance tree?
>
>> The target is the parent table of a bunch of partitions.
>
> How many would "a bunch" be, exactly?  I'm fairly sure that the complex
> view would get re-planned for each target table ...

The table being updated (line) has 57 child tables.

-Toby

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug? Query plans / EXPLAIN using gigabytes of memory
Next
From: Toby Corkindale
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug? Query plans / EXPLAIN using gigabytes of memory