Re: default value returned from sql stmt - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: default value returned from sql stmt
Date
Msg-id 4F756D31.2050009@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: default value returned from sql stmt  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: default value returned from sql stmt
Re: default value returned from sql stmt
List pgsql-general
On 30/03/12 08:46, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2012/3/30 Richard Huxton<dev@archonet.com>:
>> On 29/03/12 23:28, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>
>>> select anum from t1 where anum = 4
>>> union all select 100 limit 1;
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure the ordering here is guaranteed by the standard though, is it?
>> You could end up with the 4 being discarded.
>
> A order is random for only "UNION", "UNION ALL" should to respect
> order.  But I didn't check it in standard.

Let's put it this way - a quick bit of googling can't find anything that
says the order *is* guaranteed, and (almost?) no other operations do so
by default.

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Albe Laurenz"
Date:
Subject: Re: octet_length operator: what encoding?
Next
From: Albert
Date:
Subject: Re: user get notification when postgresql database updated