Re: patch for parallel pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
Date
Msg-id 4F5F8DA5.1030408@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch for parallel pg_dump  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: patch for parallel pg_dump  (Andrew Dunstan <adunstan@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 03/13/2012 01:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> I tried this actually (patch attached) but then I wanted to test it
>> and couldn't find anything that used pgpipe() on Windows.
>>
>> pg_basebackup/pg_basebackup.c is using it but it's in an #ifndef WIN32
>> and the same is true for postmaster/syslogger.c. Am I missing
>> something or has this Windows implementation become stale by now? I'll
>> append the patch but haven't adapted the pg_dump patch yet to use it.
>> Should we still go forward the way you proposed?
> Dunno.  Can we get an opinion on that from one of the Windows guys?
> Andrew, Magnus?
>
>

I haven't had time to review this patch or even follow all the 
discussion as I was hoping. I'll try to review the whole thing shortly.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: patch for parallel pg_dump
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and statistics