(2012/03/12 13:04), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2012/03/09 23:48), Tom Lane wrote:
>> Etsuro Fujita<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
>>> 2. IMHO RelOptInfo.fdw_private seems confusing. How about renaming it
>>> to e.g., RelOptInfo.fdw_state?
>>
>> Why is that better? It seems just as open to confusion with another
>> field (ie, the execution-time fdw_state).
>
> I thought the risk. However, I feel that the naming of
> RelOptInfo.fdw_state is not so bad because it is used only at the query
> planning time, not used along with the execution-time fdw_private.
I wrote the execution-time fdw_private by mistake. I meant the
execution-time fdw_state. I'm sorry about that.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
