Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Date
Msg-id 4F4FF39E.6060209@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)  (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/1/12 1:57 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> My expectation is that this feature will make life a lot
>> easier for a lot of Postgres users.
> 
> Yes.  It's hard to overstate the apparent utility of this feature in
> the general category of visibility and profiling.

More importantly, this is what pg_stat_statements *should* have been in
8.4, and wasn't.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Farina
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays