Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date
Msg-id 4F4FB513.40405@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
>> And how would a DBA know that?
> 
> We'd add a column to pg_class that tracks which page version is in use
> for each relation.

So a relation can't have some pages in Version 9.2, and other pages in
version 9.3?  How will this work for 2TB tables?

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: incompatible pointer types with newer zlib
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2